Template:Did you know nominations/Arizona Territory capitals

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Arizona Territory capitals

(

)

... that the capital of the Arizona Territory moved from Prescott to Tucson, back to Prescott, and then to Phoenix in its first 25 years? This is the premise of the whole article. Summarized in [1], however the JSTOR journal is a much better source

Reviewed: Fulvous Owl
Comment: I can't recall the period "25 years" in any of the sources, but all the dates are sourced and non-controversial facts from which 25 years is a simple calculation.

Created by MB (talk). Self-nominated at 00:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: New Enough, Long enough, Multiples sources (thank you for prioritizing), has a neutral tone, Earwigs say 4.8%, the entire article covers the hook, the hook is interesting. With slight revisions to the hook, I think this is good to go. dm (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Dmadeo, yes. That was such a small grammatical correction that you could have made it yourself. MB 13:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

True, perhaps I should have suggested an ALT hook. I would not have edited yours. Thanks for the article and the DYK submission dm (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Dmadeo, You could have edited the hook since the change was minor and fixed a very obvious omission. That goes on all the time here. Thanks for the review. MB 15:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)