Template:Did you know nominations/Argentine quota law
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Argentine quota law
[edit]- ... that the 1991 Argentine quota law, which sets minimum quotas of female candidacies to legislatures, was imitated by eleven other Latin American countries?
- Reviewed: William Brydone Jack Observatory
Created by Cambalachero (talk). Self nominated at 03:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC).
- The content is very skimpy and relies on only one source. A quick check of Google shows that is a widely-discussed topic and there are many good sources out there, including The 30 Percent Quota Law: A turning point for women's political participation in Argentina (un.org), "Political Tango, Women in the Lead" (NY Times), "Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina" (Politics & Gender). Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- I've expanded the article a bit, with some additional sources. More could be done with the sources I used (and other sources exist), but at least the article no longer depends on a single source. I think it's time for another look from a reviewer.
Note, however, that when I tried to find a list of the other 11 countries that added similar laws in the next decade (the factoid cited in the hook), I only found 10 (unless we want to count Honduras, which enacted a similar law a few years later). I've edited the hook...--Orlady (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- I've expanded the article a bit, with some additional sources. More could be done with the sources I used (and other sources exist), but at least the article no longer depends on a single source. I think it's time for another look from a reviewer.