Template:Did you know nominations/Ant-Man and the Wasp
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ant-Man and the Wasp
[edit]- ... that Ant-Man and the Wasp was the first Marvel Cinematic Universe film to feature a female character in its title? Source:
On being the first MCU film to have a female character in the title with the Wasp,...
(middle of the second paragraph of the Development section) Reference
Improved to Good Article status by Adamstom.97 (talk) and Favre1fan93 (talk). Nominated by Favre1fan93 (talk) at 05:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Inline citation needs to be directly after the hook. - Interesting:
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
Waiting on the QPQ and the duplicate citation. SounderBruce 06:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
@SounderBruce: Huh? The source is right after the hook. There's additional info in that sentence after the hook. Still working to complete the QPQ. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- From section 3b of the eligibility criteria:
Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact. Citations at the end of the paragraph are not sufficient.
- I personally don't like it, but it's a bureaucratic procedure. SounderBruce 05:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well technically it is, since the hook starts the sentence and then we go into quoted material. It would not make sense to have the reference tag at any preceding period/full stop than where it currently is. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- It'd be fairly easy to just insert the citation after the comma following "Wasp" and keep it there until the hook is off the Main Page. That's what I normally do for situations requiring this (e.g. the hook being full in the lead and spread between sentences in the body). SounderBruce 01:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've done that (though I agree with you that I don't like that procedure). I've also done my QPQ. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- @SounderBruce: Is this good to go? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:11, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've done that (though I agree with you that I don't like that procedure). I've also done my QPQ. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- It'd be fairly easy to just insert the citation after the comma following "Wasp" and keep it there until the hook is off the Main Page. That's what I normally do for situations requiring this (e.g. the hook being full in the lead and spread between sentences in the body). SounderBruce 01:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well technically it is, since the hook starts the sentence and then we go into quoted material. It would not make sense to have the reference tag at any preceding period/full stop than where it currently is. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
This is now ready for promotion. SounderBruce 01:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
