Template:Did you know nominations/Anonychomyrma constricta

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Anonychomyrma constricta

(

)

... that the extinct ant Anonychomyrma constricta (pictured) has been placed in four different genera since it was first described in 1868?

Reviewed: Arcovenator

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nominated at 00:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC).

Article is new enough, has more than 1500 characters, and within policy. However, the hook is not cited with an inline citation and is not stated explicitly in the article – i.e., a sentence like "It has been placed within four different genera: w, x, y, and z" followed by a citation. Other than that, it all looks fine, but personally I would use "first described" instead of just "described" per the context of the hook in question. Cloudchased (talk) 02:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Its in the history and classification section, with the first three generic placements being cited to Wheeler, and the last placement (move from Iridomyrmex to Anonychomyrma) cited to Shattuck. I have added "first" to the hook--Kev min § 02:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt response. Good to go! Cloudchased (talk) 02:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)