Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Landouw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Annie Landouw

[edit]

Annie Landouw

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nominated at 06:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC).

  •  Doing... --TitoDutta 22:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  • 1) Not very interesting hook unless told which character 2) Image licensing issue, uploader does not seem to be copyright holder. --TitoDutta 22:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Titodutta, have you looked at the part where it says this is a derivative work? I am, technically, the copyright holder on the derivative work of the public domain image (linked as the source). I don't claim copyright on it, because I don't feel I should, but there are some who will reimagine PD images and claim copyright. How is the name of the character more interesting? We could add "main" before character, but 99% of our readers will not know who Yah is. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Date, length, copyvio checked. If you crop a public domain image and claim copyright, then "Licensing" is incorrect where license details of the original image has been given, but, there is nothing about the derivative work. --TitoDutta 03:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
    • No, it says "I release this under the following license", which means I am putting my derivative work in the public domain as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Those URAA, EU anonymous etc templates are not applicable for the derivative work, since you cropped (created) it yesterday. I have made some changes. You can revert it and discuss here. (PS. for some reason, I am not being notified, but, I am following watchlist) --TitoDutta 03:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Nobody has claimed as much in my FACs before, although in theory it has merit. Your changes look fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:26, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Okay, good to go. --TitoDutta 03:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)