Template:Did you know nominations/Anita Calvert Lebourgeoise

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by BlueMoonset (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Anita Calvert Lebourgeoise

(

)

Anita Calvert Lebourgeoise, 1910s

... that Anita Calvert Lebourgeoise, judge, genealogist, and women's suffrage orator, founded the The Invincible Magazine of History and Biography, the only publication of its kind edited by a woman? Source: Johnson, Anne. Notable women of St. Louis, 1914 ([1])
- ALT1:... that Anita Calvert Lebourgeoise, while covering a Tammany Hall meeting where the press was not invited, hid in a locker and took notes on her hat and dress because she forgot paper? Source: Johnson, Anne. Notable women of St. Louis, 1914 ([2])

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Queens Hospital Center
5x expanded by Elisa.rolle (talk). Self-nominated at 16:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC).

I like the ALT1 hook best. Kaldari (talk) 21:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
New enough (5x expansion began 11 edits ago on 4 August 2017), long enough (3,743 characters "readable prose size"), fully referenced (but we usually require [page numbers for books). Main hook fine, supported by online reference. ALT1 hook also fine, preferred. Image fine, has appropriate licence. No QPQ required. Good to go.. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

, Hawkeye7, added pages for Notable Women. Elisa.rolle

I hate to do this twice to the same nominator in a row, but a 1914 local-history work can't know that something's "the only publication of its kind edited by a woman". A modern comprehensive source is needed for this kind of claim. E Eng 01:06, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

actually the hook that was approved is ALT1 that does not use "the only publication of its kind edited by a woman". Please review ALT1 since both users above said it's the best. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. I've struck ALT0 to be sure. E Eng 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, with three prior DYK credits on Elisa.rolle's talk page, and two more nominations currently in prep sets, this nomination will require a QPQ review, since the five freebies will have been used up. Please provide one when you get the chance. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

QPQ provided Elisa.rolle (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

The article does not have nearly enough original prose to qualify for DYK. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Note to Elisa.rolle: while Wikipedia is fine with incorporating public domain material into its articles, DYK doesn't count such material toward its minimum prose counts, since the emphasis is on new and original content. See WP:DYK#Long enough for details. I hope this doesn't affect others of your articles from the "Notable women" source. If you can expand the article based on other non-public-domain sources, it could still qualify, though I don't know how much additional material we're talking about. Please let us know if you plan to try an expansion. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Nope, sorry, that is my main source, and it was already worked to incorporate it in the existing article. Therefore I do not have other space for more changes. Just withdraw this DYK nomination. Elisa.rolle (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Just to be clear, if you paraphrase the source in your own words instead of simply copying, then it counts as new. You generally want to do that anyway, since most sources aren't written in an appropriate style anyway. E Eng 17:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)