The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: I've deferred this to another user because this is my first DYK review, but the article looks good. dudhhrtalkcontribs (he/they) 00:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I concur with the above evaluation. Nicely sourced throughout, interesting hook, don't see any real copyvio problems, and the source is taken in good faith.Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)