Template:Did you know nominations/Animal Nature

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Article remains too short to qualify for DYK; closing as unsuccessful.

Animal Nature

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Animal Nature album consists of ten new tracks along with "a handful of alternate edits and remixes of album cuts"?

Converted from a redirect by Filmomusico (talk). Self-nominated at 15:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC).

• @Filmomusico: The readable prose size is not over 1500 characters. The article reads incomplete and gives 2 lines as intro and 3 reviews. There is hardly anything in it about the album as such. Please expand accordingly and then we can continue the review ahead. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

• The ping didn't worked for some reason. Either way, yes, I nominated the article first due to a hook which I thought was rather interesting to include. It doesn't say anywhere that stubs or redirects are excluded, but it does say that an article must have at least 1500 words.:( Perhaps, there will be a will of someone to expand it?--Filmomusico (talk) 19:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refer Rule D7. "Articles that fail to deal adequately with the topic are also likely to be rejected." Also, we cant just wait for someone's will to expand it. Rejecting for now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

References