Template:Did you know nominations/Angelo De Donatis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Angelo De Donatis

(

)

... that Angelo De Donatis was the first person who was not a cardinal to be appointed Vicar General of Rome since the sixteenth century? Source: Francis appoints "pastor" as new vicar of Rome
- ATL1:... that Pope Francis appointed Archbishop Angelo De Donatis the new Vicar General of Rome and Archpriest of the Archbasilica of St. John Lateran? Sources: "(In Italian) It is...Angelo De Donatis...who succeeds Cardinal Agostino Vallini as the new vicar of the Diocese of Rome." & "(In Italian) Francis also...appointed him archpriest of the Lateran basilica. " (RomaSette article)

Reviewed: Irish Fright

Created by Ergo Sum (talk). Self-nominated at 02:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC).

Having worked on this entry and suggested language along these lines I support the version now proposed. It's a complex point to make succinctly, so I hope others will offer rewrites. The title Vicar General means little to the average reader. My own suggestion, though I don't like saying "pope" twice, is:
ALT2: ...that since the sixteenth century no one under the rank of cardinal has managed the Diocese of Rome on behalf of the pope until Pope Francis gave Angelo De Donatis that assignment this year? Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Since Bmclaughlin9 has made significant edits to the article, I have added him to the DYK creation credits. Yoninah (talk) 19:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

It seems, based on that, that the hook is supported. @Bmclaughlin9: Would you like to promote the hook according to the instructions, since self-promotion is deprecated? Ergo Sum 18:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Ergo Sum: Per WP:DYKSG#H2 you are not allowed to approve your own article, and Bmclaughlin9 is not allowed to approve his own hook. And a hook reviewer cannot promote what s/he reviews. Calling on new reviewer to complete this review, after which a different prep builder will promote it. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. Wasn't aware of that. Ergo Sum 19:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

The ALT2 hook is acceptable, as is the original hook, but I have struck ALT1 as being less interesting to a general audience. The article was new enough when nominated and is long enough. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. This is good to go and a promoter will move it to a prep set shortly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I came by to promote this. I added cites to 2 paragraphs – please check that I did that correctly. Also, there is a "citation needed" tag in the last paragraph under "Episcopal ministry". Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

@Yoninah: It looks like you've added those citations correctly. I've also removed the various references to Ostia, since they were uncited and I could not find any citations for them. Barring any other issues, the article should be good to go. Ergo Sum 23:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Restoring tick per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC)