Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Anandalahari

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Anandalahari

Anandalahari musical instrument
Anandalahari musical instrument
  • ... that anandalahari (pictured) is a Bengali chordophone musical instrument? Source: Dick, Alastair; Montagu, Jeremy (2014). "Ānandalaharī". Grove Music Online. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-4002261310.

Created by Amkgp (talk). Self-nominated at 02:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC).

  • @Amkgp: Thank you very much for the QPQ, however you actually do not need one at the moment so you can reuse it after you have 5 DYK credits.
  • New enough, long enough, no copyvios. Picture is good. However, I do not find the hook interesting. Do you have an alternative? The article does not look neutral "This instrument's melody drives oneself to fall in love with the musical mystics, the baul" this sounds a bit promotional as an example for you. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 13:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • I'll AGF with the sources. Outstanding issue:
  • Hook not interesting.
  • Neutrality

VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 13:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

@Vincent60030: I have removed the promotional lines from the article. Is the new hook acceptable? ~ Amkgp 💬 14:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, I would generally be fine with it, but I would ask for a second opinion from @Yoninah:. Neutrality issue fixed, so just left with hooks. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • ALT1 is okay; I formatted the link and fixed the grammar. But there are some issues with the article. None of the book references give page numbers. The second and third sentences of the lead don't belong there, but in a later section describing the instrument. I suggest adding some subheads here, like: Name, Description, Use. Yoninah (talk) 15:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
@Yoninah:, I did not get it, can you please elaborate so I can do the corrections needed. Pages p 106-107 for source [1] added here as well at the article. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
(ec)#When you cite a book source, you need to include the page number on which the material appears.
  1. I'll move things around for you. Though it's a short article, someone else can always expand the sections. Yoninah (talk) 15:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
@Yoninah: I have addressed all the issues for this hook and article. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
@Amkgp: Good job, your first DYK tick! No issues from me :D VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 03:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)