Template:Did you know nominations/Ambassadors (TV series)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ambassadors (TV series)
[edit]- ... that the writers of Ambassadors ended up with 200 pages of research?
- Ambassadors (TV series) – Tentinator (give) (tag) – View nom subpage
Created by Tentinator (talk). Self nominated at 14:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC).
I'd supposed paraphrasing is needed for this hook because the quote also uses "ended up with 200..." ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 10:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the writers of Ambassadors were left with two hundred pages of research?
- ALT2 ... that a read-through of Ambassadors was run in one of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's grandest rooms?
- Tentinator 18:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC) Note to reviewer: a QPQ will be required per this other nomination by Tentinator. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Geoff Abrams Tentinator 17:35, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Length, date, NPOV, and QPQ are good. Hook is cited and the article is cited and the sources back up what is written. I will say that I did pause a bit at the somewhat large amount of quotes, but given the nature of information that is available after just a few episodes of a new TV show, the article should be good to go. Thingg⊕⊗ 02:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
