Template:Did you know nominations/Aluminium phosphide poisoning

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 ^talk 22:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
13 days and no indication of progress to resolve highlighted issues with nomination

Aluminium phosphide poisoning

(

)

... that aluminium phosphide has no known specific antidote?

Created/expanded by Sarindam7 (talk). Nominated by Intelati (talk) at 22:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

We seem to be having a plagiarism problem. The lead is identical to the introduction of this article :Acute aluminium phosphide poisoning: Can we predict mortality? I stopped checking after that. Poliocretes (talk) 19:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

It clearly states in that source: "this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License". Sarindam7 needs a wrist slap for failing to attribute so it does not count as a copyvio but it certainly makes it inappropriate to use for DYK.

It was and important poisoning that lacked a WP page. I never claimed that the text came from my brain. If I had to plagiarize, I would have not added inline citations linking to the sources. Its certainly does not require a separate acknowledgement sub-header, as proposed by someone. Its from PD sources, so I think I can pass on that "wrist slap." As for DYK - if "YK" then don't add it.Sarindam7 22:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Creative Commons Attribution means you have to give credit to the author when using his or her work. The red X is for the large amount of problem tags on the top of the article, which hasn't been touched in 13 days. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)