Template:Did you know nominations/Allie Reynolds
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Allie Reynolds
[edit]
- ... that the New York Yankees traded for Allie Reynolds (pictured) on the advice of Joe DiMaggio?
- ALT1: ... that Allie Reynolds (pictured) was discovered by baseball coach Henry Iba while practicing his javelin throws?
- ALT2:
... that Allie Reynolds (pictured) was allowed to remain a member of the Major League Baseball Players Association after he retired?
- Comment: According to my math, this is just a shade under 5x expanded. I may have it up to 5x before a decision is made, but if it's not, WP:IAR?
Created/expanded by Muboshgu (talk), Gstables (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 23:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Reviewed: 1971 Łódź strikes
Age, length OK. But this is 100 characters short of a 5x expansion, which basically means adding another paragraph. In addition, some of your references are bald URLs; please see WP:Citation templates to format them. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- All bare urls are fixed. I expanded it a little more so it might be at 5x expanded by now, but it only tells me the prose size is 14k, and not if it's at the needed 14,125 yet. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'd hate to get overly picky over whether an expansion of this magnitude (more than 11,000 characters) is 4.97x or 5.01x expanded. But as of now, I have it at 5.02, so it looks like the expansion is adequate in any case. I used Word and manually removed the headers, footnote superscripts etc. That gets me from 2,820 characters to 14,168 characters, or 5.02x. It is possible I neglected to remove a superscript or two, but there is 40-60 characters to spare at this point. Rlendog (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Bingo! The count is now 3 characters shy of 5x, which is 5x in my book. (By the way, Rlendog, you can do an easier count using this tool.) Now, to the references. As I was formatting more refs, I saw some material that was cited to a source, but wasn't included in the source, for which I added "citation needed" tag. Could you fix this up and then we'll be ready to go? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I took care of the references. As for that unsupported text, I couldn't find anything to back it up. So, I took it out and added in a few other places. According to my calculations, it was a net positive of a few characters, so if anything it's not shy of 5x by anything any more. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
