Template:Did you know nominations/All Saints Church, Odiham
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 08:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
All Saints Church, Odiham
[edit]... that the upper parts of the Tudor tower of All Saints Church, Odiham (pictured) were completely rebuilt in the 17th century?
5x expanded by Amandajm (talk). Nominated by Deferential redbrick (talk) at 02:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC).
- Tagline: not accurate. The only parts of the tower that can properly be described as "Tudor" are the door and the square-topped window. The base of the tower is said to be 13th century (Heritage listing) and the upper sections are Renaissance, not Tudor (built during the Stuart period). That Tudor window may have been intact and simply reused in the brick rebuild. Confusion is caused by the fact that someone has put a very brief and inaccurate couple of lines on the church's webpage.
Propose alternative:
- ALT1 ... that the upper parts of the Medieval tower of All Saints Church, Odiham (pictured) were completely rebuilt in the 17th century?
- Going with ALT1. This article is new enough and long enough. The hook is well sourced and the image is appropriately licensed and is a Featured Picture. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)