The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Overall: I am happy with this one. No need to do a QPQ because you do not yet have 5 DYKs. I personally prefer ALT0 because it is a positive comment. Although ALT1 is likely to attract far more views, I think it could be understood as being similar to repeating an untrue rumour (although of course it is true that the untrue statement was indeed made, and cited). But that is just my opinion. Both ALTs are acceptable for DYK. Thank you for this detailed and useful article. Storye book (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
You have perfectly summarized by thought process! While the first puts the club in a more positive light, the second is more "clickbait". I'm indifferent between the two, maybe more inclined towards the first. Thanks for taking your time to review this nomination! Nehme1499 (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I am happy with this one. No need to do a QPQ because you do not yet have 5 DYKs. I personally prefer ALT0 because it is a positive comment. Although ALT1 is likely to attract far more views, I think it could be understood as being similar to repeating an untrue rumour (although of course it is true that the untrue statement was indeed made, and cited). But that is just my opinion. Both ALTs are acceptable for DYK. Thank you for this detailed and useful article. Storye book (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2020 (UTC)