Template:Did you know nominations/Aeroflot Flight 593

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Aeroflot Flight 593

(

)

... that an untrained minor in command of [the] controls crashed an airplane, killing all seventy-five occupants on impact?
- ALT1:... that a child in command of [the] controls crashed an airplane, killing all seventy-five occupants on impact?

Improved to Good Article status by Thanoscar21 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC).

Thanoscar21, Date, size, refs, all GTG. No QPQ which does not seem required as I didn't find any evidence of DYKs on user's talk (ping User:BlueMoonset - can you double-check this?). I do however think we need a fix in the hook. The child (minor...) was never in 'command of [the] controls. They just touched some button which caused a cascade failure. The hook needs to be rewritten. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Piotrus, there has only been a single prior nomination, and it wasn't eligible at the time, so it doesn't count as a DYK credit. A quid pro quo nomination is not required for this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Piotrus, if you look at the transcript, he child was in command of the controls for quite some time, and the summary of the crash was "Pilot error, untrained minor in command of controls". Thanks, Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 12:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanoscar21, Can you add this to the article with the reference? Right now the only place in the article the word 'command' is used is in the infobox, without a reference. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Piotrus, it's already in the article. Thanks, Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 12:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanoscar21, The reference, yes, but the word command still doesn't appear in prose anywhere. My concern is not with the reference but with the fact that the hook uses a phrase that is not in the prose. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Piotrus, fixed. MEisSCAMMER^(talk)_Hello! 13:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

MEisSCAMMER , I guess, I'll AGF the sources use this language. Btw, could you comment here? Talk:Aeroflot_Flight_593#Policy_changes?. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)