Template:Did you know nominations/Adenanthos ellipticus
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Adenanthos ellipticus
[edit]- ... that the oval-leaf adenanthos is known from only three populations covering less than 0.31 km2 (77 acres) in Fitzgerald River National Park?
Created by Casliber (talk), Mishae (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 05:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC).
-
- It is a recently new article
- ~1950 characters
- Cited inline, refs look reliable
- Issues/Suggestions
- Lead says "not threatened" (referenced to something which says "Threatened Flora (Declared Rare Flora — Extant)", infobox says "near threatened", and #Status says vulnerable. Please reconcile this.
- Ref for last sentence of #Taxonomy? Also, what is a section, or what is it a section of? I haven't heard it as a taxonomy term.
- ref added - link to section (botany) added. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Continuation:
- QPQ satisfied
- No copyvio or excessive paraphrasing noted
- Mention in lead that species in endemic to Western Australia?
- Imperial convert for 0.31 square kilometres? Acre looks to be on a suitable scale.
- When the last two are resolved, this will be good to go. Chris857 (talk) 23:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Continuation:
