Template:Did you know nominations/Actinote zikani
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Actinote zikani
- ... that Actinote zikani (specimen pictured) was rediscovered in Brazil ten years after being declared extinct?
- ALT1: ... that Actinote zikani (specimen pictured) is one of only two butterflies on the IUCN's list of the 100 most threatened species? Source: https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2012-096.pdf
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Voss (Alexander McQueen collection)
- Comment: This is a translated article.
- comment: Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins has significantly contributed to the article GA
Created by Sir MemeGod (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 12:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC).
- Reviewing..., Article is new enough and long enough. The citations need formatting and duplication clean-up immediately, you have the same refs multiple times, and names should not be capscase, among other issues. Also citations should not be in the lede, if something is in the lede, it should be in the body with a citation there. Also beware of peacockery.--Kevmin § 16:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Sir MemeGod: of initial comments.--Kevmin § 17:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Kevmin: I have fixed the lede, fixed (most) of the peacockery issues, and there are no duplicate citations as of my last check, 2 minutes ago. Apologies for not getting back sooner, I had COVID and really wasn't in the mood to edit. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 12:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- The fixes are good, I'm going to pause the nom review to see what the GA review outcome is.--Kevmin § 16:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, that makes sense. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
@Kevmin: GAN passed. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 17:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Article GA passed, original nomination was new enough and long enough. I known that the specific 8a.m. time is going to hit problems either in the promotion process here, or on the main page. I would say the more accurate part of that sentence is "at sunrise", that should be corrected to avoid the wp:overprecision of the statement.--Kevmin § 18:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 18:21, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Article GA passed, original nomination was new enough and long enough. I known that the specific 8a.m. time is going to hit problems either in the promotion process here, or on the main page. I would say the more accurate part of that sentence is "at sunrise", that should be corrected to avoid the wp:overprecision of the statement.--Kevmin § 18:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- GA nom good to go. No identified copyvios, article cited and sourced per DYK. Sources are confirmed and hook is verified to sourcing. I would suggest including the mounted specimen image for the hook as well, image is main page compliant from Flicker cc-by-0 account of DNA sequenced specimens. Looks good to go.--Kevmin § 13:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sir MemeGod, if you prefer the original image, you can let me know and I'll strike out the cropped one. Regards, Rjjiii (talk) 03:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Sir MemeGod, I notice the lack of a media marker on the approved hook; please include it so that ALT0 may be promoted along with your preferred image. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)