Template:Did you know nominations/A Tribute for the Negro
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
A Tribute for the Negro
- ... that in his review of A Tribute for the Negro (frontispiece pictured) by Wilson Armistead, Frederick Douglass criticised how it included an image of him that was edited to give him a smile? Source: "Douglass, who was critical of the superimposed smile ..." [1]
- ALT1: ... that British abolitionist Wilson Armistead dedicated his book A Tribute for the Negro (frontispiece pictured) to the American anti-slavery campaigners Frederick Douglass, James Pennington and Alexander Crummell? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yinka Ilori
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 11:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/A Tribute for the Negro; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- see comment below - Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Hi there @Lajmmoore: the article looks good; it is new and long enough, there are no problems with copyvios (Earwig's only throws up the name), QPQ is done, sourcing is good and hook is cited. Hookwise, I much prefer ALT0; it seems a lot more interesting. On the image side of things, it is free to use (PD) and is clear at 120px. However, I am a bit concerned about your comment on the talk page. I feel that not using the sources you have put on the talk page could be seen as not covering all the major viewpoints. This is my only concern; could you please address this? Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Schminnte, thanks very much for the review - I'll be delayed in addressing your concerns as I have a lot of off-wiki deadlines going into early next week. I'll take a proper look as soon as I can Lajmmoore (talk) 06:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Schminnte - it took me a little longer than I anticipated to work on this, but I've gone through the sources from white authors, and added three into the article that convey new infomation that isn't published elsewhere. There were a couple that I couldn't access ultimately, which I've commented about on the talk page, so hopefully another editor will come along and incorporate those. Please me know if there's anything additional to add. Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for that Lajmmoore: I think we are good to go now. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 07:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
