Template:Did you know nominations/A Rustling of Leaves: Inside the Philippine Revolution
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 19:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
A Rustling of Leaves: Inside the Philippine Revolution
- ... that the film A Rustling of Leaves: Inside the Philippine Revolution had its audio recorded using a Walkman? Source: Posner, Michael (1993). Canadian Dreams: The Making and Marketing of Independent Films. Canadian Independent Film Caucus. ISBN 1550541145.
- ALT1: ... that Nettie Wild buried $100,000 of film equipment each night during the filming of A Rustling of Leaves: Inside the Philippine Revolution? Source: "Lives On The Line: Filming documentary was risky - now comes fight for Canadian screenings". Vancouver Sun. 5 May 1989. p. D1. Archived from the original on 16 October 2023 – via Newspapers.com.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Guglielmo Zuelli
5x expanded by Jon698 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/A Rustling of Leaves: Inside the Philippine Revolution; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Article expansion is new enough, long enough, and cited throughout to RS. No copyvio detected. There are some minor issue with the hooks. The original hook is verifiable to the cited reference but needs some clarity that a A Rustling of Leaves: Inside the Philippine Revolution is a film in order for the hook fact to be surprising. I originally assumed it was an audio book someone read into a walkman when I first read it and had not read the article. Some tweaking to language would benefit that hook. The alt hook doesn't have a citation immediately after the hook fact; although I assume the citation at the end of the paragraph is verifying all of the content in the paragraph. However, DYK requires citations immediately after the sentence with the hook fact. Once these minor issues are fixed the promoter can choose between the two hooks. Additionally, the nominator has not yet reviewed an article at DYK and needs to do so before this hook is promoted. 4meter4 (talk) 12:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
