Template:Did you know nominations/7 Espantos

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Los Espantos, Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espantito

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

• Los Espantos
• Espanto I
• Espanto II
• Espanto III
• Espanto IV and V
• Los Hijos del Espanto
• Espantito

)

• ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr. and Mini-Estrella Espantito?

• Reviewed: (1) The Boy Next Door (film)
  (2) Diego Salvador Martinez Hernandez De La Cruz
  (3) Phillip Adams (sport shooter)
  (4) Danny Higginbotham
  (5) Old College, Aberystwyth
  (6) Incognitoolithus
  (7) Lord Baltimore penny

• 4 of the 7 reviews have been completed and promoted. A 5th has been approved. The other two are well under way.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

• Comment: Neither Espanto Jr. (CMLL) nor the Espanto Jr. article were expanded enough but is still part of the group of Espanto wrestlers and thus part of the list but not "featured" as such. Still 7 DKYs in one is pretty good. My biggest DYK to date. Note the "more than 10" refers to the fact that there have been other wrestlers who used the mask without permission, they do not have articles as they may or may not pass the WP:GNG.

Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 22:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC).

• Reviewing--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

• • All articles were created on April 4 and all articles are long enough.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The sourcing for this hook is an Offline (presumably print edition) encyclopedia in a foreign language. I will WP:AGF that the sourcing is adequate.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I consider the hook to be sufficiently interesting.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  • The hook barely exceeds the 200 characters (202 not counting the ellipses, but counting the question mark), but with this many articles included, it is short enough.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Sourcing in general for the article is offline and in Spanish, so I will AGF regarding copyright as well. The article does seem to have a neutral encyclopedic tone.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

• --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:13, 14 April 2016 (UTC)