Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Ticketmaster controversy

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

2022 Ticketmaster controversy

(

)

... that the 2022 Ticketmaster controversy over Taylor Swift's the Eras Tour has triggered investigations by several U.S. state attorneys general and the federal Department of Justice? Source: Bloomberg The New York Times
- Reviewed:

Created by Ronherry (talk). Self-nominated at 06:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article and hook satisfy all criteria for DYK, though Earwig detects a rather high copyvio score, due in large part to the sourced quotes. Otherwise, I see no reason to approve this hook as soon as QPQ has been satisfied. JJonahJackalope (talk) 18:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

@Ronherry: pinging in case you didn't see this. If you can't get QPQ then I would be willing to sponsor this with one of mine...I've got a surplus of QPQ reviews. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@TheSandDoctor: This is the first time I'm nominating an article for DYK. @JJonahJackalope: ~~I thought the first five nominations are free of QPQ? Am I right? If not, please help me out on how this should work. Thanks.~~ ℛonherry☘ 20:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@TheSandDoctor: And thank you for tagging me here. I had no idea I had received a response. And yes, I think I'd like you to sponsor it. Thank you. ℛonherry☘ 20:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Ronherry sorry about that, didn't realize this was your first DYK nom, approving this now. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

JJonahJackalope That's okay! Thank you. ℛonherry☘ 05:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

@Ronherry and JJonahJackalope:

I'm seeing quite a few citations to Business Insider; given its status as RSP-yellowlit, could you talk to me about its reliability for a high-profile controversy like this one? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 11:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: There were six different Business Insider sources in the article, five of which have been replaced with sources from other publications. ℛonherry☘ 11:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Since the last one is a direct quote, looks good to me – thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 11:57, 15 December 2022 (UTC)