Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Sweden riots

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

2022 Sweden riots

(
)
  • ... that the leader of an anti-Islam group in Sweden burned a Quran, the Muslim holy book, during the holy month of Ramadan with police permission and caused 2022 Sweden riots?

Created by Dunutubble (talk). Nominated by Aye1399 (talk) at 14:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC).

    • Reviewed: Not required
  • Comment (not review), Aye1399, the hook needs to contain a bolded wikilink to the subject, e.g. 2022 Sweden riots or riots. I have done some edits to the hook's grammar. TSventon (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Aye1399, please can you edit the hook so it mentions the subject of the article, otherwise it won't be usable for DYK. By the way, you need to add a user name and sign your comment in the same edit to generate a notification. TSventon (talk) 06:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment the article was created by Dunutubble, not Aye1399. Dunutubble, are you happy with this nomination? TSventon (talk) 08:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Just pointing out that anyone can nominate an article created by someone else; it happens all the time at DYK. If the creator sees issues with the nomination, they are free to point them out, or to suggest alternate hooks. I've adjusted the "Created by" line above to reflect the creation and nomination info; the DYKmake templates are correct. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
  • I would like to request another reviewer. Aye1399 (talk) 11:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
  • I'll do it. --evrik (talk) 02:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Thank you evrik. Aye1399, "Comment (not review)" normally means the editor is not intending to review the nomination, so I am happy for someone else to do so. TSventon (talk) 03:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @TSventon: If you have any other comments on the article, could you address them here rather than reversing my work? Thank you. --evrik (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Evrik:, can you explain why you have commented out my Better source needed tag? If a tag is resolved or unnecessary, it can be removed. The text preceding the Anadolu Agency (AA) reference is based on that source, not on Euronews, and inherits the AA point of view, which is not neutral, so I believe a tag is justified. TSventon (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
I have replaced the text based on the Anadolu Agency article with more neutral text from a Brussels Times article. I have therefore removed my Better source needed tag and your Why tag. TSventon (talk) 07:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: No QPQ needed. I've tagged a couple of areas that need explanation. The hook needs to be reworked. I've supplied an alternate. --evrik (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

evrik, I would suggest that triggered is a better verb than caused in your hook. The lead uses the word triggered, but should be immediately followed by a reference to support the hook. I have noted on the talk page that the first paragraph of the timeline section is not written from a neutral POV and added a better source needed tag. TSventon (talk) 08:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Alt1 "... that recent riots in Sweden were caused by the leader of an anti-Islamic group burning a Quran during the holy month of Ramadan? --evrik (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Alt2 "... that the burning of Quran by leader of an anti-Islamic group during the holy month of Ramadan under police protection triggered the 2022 Sweden riots?
  • evrik, I believe this is important to be in the presence of the police, and the police believe that this support is due to freedom of opinion and democracy in Sweden.Aye1399 (talk) 06:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Aye1399: there are a lot of dependent clauses in these hooks. Can you tighten up the hooks? Also, the timeline section of the article needs some clarification. --evrik (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • @Evrik:,Hi, thanks. "there are a lot of dependent clauses in these hook," what is the problem with this? The hook can contain multiple facts and be supported by multiple sources.Aye1399 (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
  • ALT4:... that the 2022 Sweden riots stem from an anti-Islamic group burning a Quran during Ramadan with police permission?
  • @Evrik:: ALT1a is good, but it is attractive to the international audience to know that this happened with the police permission.One of the Hook's criteria is attractive. Aye1399 (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Aye1399, I am okay with Alt 4. I’ll leave it to the promoter. --evrik (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/2022_Sweden_riots&oldid=1091734574"