Template:Did you know nominations/2020 AV2
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2020 AV2
Long-exposure telescope image of 2020 AV2 (center)
- ... that the near-Earth object 2020 AV2 is the first asteroid discovered to have an orbit entirely inside that of Venus? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
- ALT1:... that the near-Earth object 2020 AV2 is the first asteroid found that has an orbit entirely inside that of Venus? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
- ALT2:... that 2020 AV2 is the first asteroid discovered to have an inter-Venusian orbit? Source: "This object is certainly special: it is the first one ever found on an orbit entirely inside that of Venus." Virtual Telescope Project
Created by Nrco0e (talk). Self-nominated at 00:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [(pictured)]. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2.
MB 03:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough and well cited; no other policy concerns. The hook is stated right in the lead, with a citation (that does back the assertion) on the sentence, so all three hooks meet "specs". The first two hooks have adjacent wikilinks which are best avoided. ALT2 doesn't have that problem and flows better as well. There is a photo in the nom, but it is not used in the hook [(pictured)]. But it's not meaningful at that size, so I am just ignoring it entirely. It looks like this is the second DYK for this nom, so no need for QPQ. Good to go with ALT2.
