Template:Did you know nominations/2019 CONCACAF Gold Cup Final

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

2019 CONCACAF Gold Cup Final

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the 2019 CONCACAF Gold Cup Final was the sixth to be contested by rivals Mexico and the United States? Source: Chicago Tribune/AP
  • ALT1: ... that the 2019 CONCACAF Gold Cup Final was played between the same teams at the same venue as the 2007 final? Source: Chicago Sun-Times
  • ALT2a: ... that teams representing the United States played in the finals of the Women's World Cup and the CONCACAF Gold Cup on the same day? Source: Washington Post
  • ALT2b: ... that the Women's World Cup and the CONCACAF Gold Cup finals both involved the United States and were played on the same day? Source: Washington Post

• Reviewed: Central Australia (territory)
• Comment: I plan on writing a separate article on the 2007 final soon, which would be worked in using ALT1.

5x expanded by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 07:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC).

• Few issues with this one SounderBruce, I see no copyvio issues, and the article meets the requirements in terms of age and length. Needs QPQ. I do have a few issues with the hooks. The main hook seems pretty arbitrary - why is the sixth time important?

Alt1 mentions it's the same teams, probably should say it's the same national teams, as it's not the same XI.

alt2 I prefer it to say they competed in both finals on the same day. Their results are not really important for the hook. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

• I have inserted a question mark above to make it clear that a review has been done. Flibirigit (talk) 00:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

• @Lee Vilenski: Sorry about the late response. A QPQ has been added above and added an alternate version of ALT2. I'm fine with dropping ALT0 and ALT1, since they aren't all that compelling in comparison. SounderBruce 05:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

• Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)