Template:Did you know nominations/2014 PBA Governors' Cup
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Montanabw(talk) 21:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
2014 PBA Governors' Cup
[edit]( )
- ... that the 2014 PBA Governors' Cup is the first PBA conference that all games (eliminations up to the finals) are aired in high definition through Cignal Digital TV?
5x expanded by Burac21 (talk), PapaJeckloy (talk), WayKurat (talk). Nominated by PapaJeckloy (talk) at 14:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC).
The hook needs a bolded word. More importantly, the hook is not directly cited in the article. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)- Bold done (obviously). MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 22:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Bold done, and the hook is now not cited on the article, directly. I have changed the statement. I think it is now qualified. -PapaJeckloy (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC).
- Unfortunately, your sources do not qualify the claim that this is the first time all games are being shown in HD. That is original research. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Are you sure of your statements? this is not an original research please prefer looking at the article this is the example, It is real that it is being aired high-definition on Cignal Digital TV, please prefer checking, this is a sample text on the article.
- Games in the tournament are televised by TV5 and AksyonTV; games are also being simulcast in high definition through a special channel exclusive to Cignal Digital TV
- It's good to go, you can also check the references, there are also no other problems than that. -PapaJeckloy (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC).
- Well, that's because I changed it to remove that specific claim, which is not given by the source at all (yes, they're being shown in HD, but your citations do not make any claim that this is the first time they are all in HD). The hook and its specific wording must be cited in the article. Also, I forgot to mention, but I do not think that other parts of the article (player lists, results, etc.) have enough citations either. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's good to go, you can also check the references, there are also no other problems than that. -PapaJeckloy (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC).
- This nomination looks like abandoned, since there were no major edits from Papajeckloy or anybody else regarding the hook and the mentioned problems above after June 24. As one of the main contributors of this article, I personally feel that this article is not DYK ready. Maybe a new DYK nomination may be created after all of the contents are properly aligned with the DYK policy. I request that this nomination be closed as rejected. -WayKurat (talk) 16:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)