Template:Did you know nominations/1919 Baden state election

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

1919 Baden state election

(

)

... that the 1919 Baden state election, the first election in Baden to allow women to vote, resulted in nine women being elected to the legislature? Source: Pages 7, 127, 129, and 132-133 of Die Revolution 1918/19 in Baden by Markus Schmidgall
Page 294 of Die politischen und wirtschaftlichen Ereignisse der Republik Baden in der Zeit der Weimarer Republik by Konrad Exner
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ordinance No. 5

5x expanded by Jon698 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1919 Baden state election; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Meets criteria, no copy-vio detected, AGF on offline sources (the two online sources check out). Article is well written and neutral; I've fixed some v v minor typos. I did wonder whether the hook could be made more concise; something like:

ALT1: ... that the first election in Baden to allow women to vote resulted in nine women being elected to the state legislature?

That leaves out the 1919 date but puts the emphasis on the interesting part of the hook. Interested in your views on this @Jon698: however also happy to approve the hook as currently worded. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

@Chocmilk03: Yeah I like your version of the hook better. Jon698 (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)