Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/151 North Franklin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

151 North Franklin

[edit]
151 North Franklin from Randolph Street
151 North Franklin from Randolph Street

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 03:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC).

  • I could actually use some advice on the name CNA Center. The former CNA home is going to soon have a Northern Trust name on it and the new home will bear the CNA Center name. I am not sure when these changes will become effective and how I should handle it.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Wait for a formal announcement (such as a press release or news article published) on the name change for the former building. FunksBrother (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm waiting to finish the review on this article. I addressed two issues above. I'll do a write up on the CNA Financial that they moved to a new building in Chicago. It'll be one now with the {{citation needed}} needing attention. FunksBrother (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
FunksBrother, What are you saying you addressed?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
TonyTheTiger there's a {{citation needed}} in the history section of the article. Also, can we agree on the hook? I don't agree with the wording of the hook. I drafted an alternative hook. FunksBrother (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
The Citation needed is not there anymore, but I am unsure how to address (source) when the names will change.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Right now, you shouldn't focus on that. The article meets all expectations now: new, long enough, and meets policy. We need to agree with the hook and hook's citation. I suggested a hook to make it less wordy.FunksBrother (talk) 04:36, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
ALT2 is good then. I'll make sure to reword a sentence in the body. FunksBrother (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)