Template:Did you know nominations/110 East 42nd Street
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
110 East 42nd Street, Pershing Square Building
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that 110 East 42nd Street and the Pershing Square Building (pictured), located above a subway station, were designed with interlocking structures, including what is thought to be New York City's tallest party wall? Source: NYCLPC (2016) p. 2
- ALT1:
... that 110 East 42nd Street and the Pershing Square Building (pictured) were designed with interlocking structures, including New York City's tallest party wall?Source: NYCLPC (2016) p. 2 - ALT1a: ... that 110 East 42nd Street and the Pershing Square Building (pictured) were designed with interlocking structures, including what is thought to be New York City's tallest party wall? Source: NYCLPC (2016) p. 2
- ALT2
:... that 110 East 42nd Street and the Pershing Square Building (pictured) replaced a hotel that was demolished to make way for a subway station near Grand Central Terminal?Source: NYCLPC (2016) p. 1
- ALT1:
Created/expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC).
- @Epicgenius: The Pershing Square article is a fivefold expansion and the other is newly created. They are both new enough and long enough. The image is suitably licensed, the hook facts for ALT0 and ALT1 are cited inline, and I like them better than ALT2. My only quibble is that the article uses the qualifier "thought to be the city's tallest party wall" while the hooks do not. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. Two QPQs have been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thanks for the review. I have added ALT1a, which does include the qualifier "thought to be". epicgenius (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Approving ALT0 and ALT1a, and striking the other hooks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)