Template:Did you know nominations/.sexy

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

.sexy

(

)

... that you can't be .sexy in private? Source: "fears about Whois privacy ... Uniregistry wants to know the real identities of all of the registrants in its TLDs, even those who register names using Whois privacy services"
- ALT1:... that toilet paper isn't .sexy? Source: "Schilling argues that the test of how generic, and by extension popular, a gTLD is should be whether toiletpaper.tld works. I think toiletpaper.guru works, but toiletpaper.sexy does not."

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kevin L. Tan

Created by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 14:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC).

New enough, long enough, neutral, both hooks cited (first inline, second one is from a quote), Earwig checks out (picks up the quote which is fine). Hooks are pretty funny, so both can be used. QPQ done. This is good to go. Roniius^{talk to me} 16:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)