The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by DanCherek (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
... that the top-level domain.guru had 35,000 websites registered to it within the first three weeks of its release? Source: Sobering figures for new Top Level Domains: "As of February, according to Krischenowski's figures, .guru was the most wanted of the just started brand new TLDs. After three weeks, 35,000 .guru-domains were registered, resulting in chatter on domaining blogs if .guru might in the end win over .ninja - for which pre-registrations can be made starting April 30."
Overall: Looks pretty good to me. Lead is a tad on the short side (but that isn't a DYK criteria, so I suppose no problems there), QPQ was not required but was completed anyways, and Earwig turned up nothing. Giving this the tick. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Looks pretty good to me. Lead is a tad on the short side (but that isn't a DYK criteria, so I suppose no problems there), QPQ was not required but was completed anyways, and Earwig turned up nothing. Giving this the tick. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 06:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)