Template:Controversial/sandbox
Appearance
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information. |
This is the template sandbox page for Template:Controversial (diff). See also the companion subpage for test cases. |
This template is used on approximately 3,500 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
Usage
[edit]No description.
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
small | small | no description | Unknown | optional |
category | category | no description | Unknown | optional |
This template will categorise articles into Category:Wikipedia controversial topics. To use this template, add {{Controversial|date=November 2024}}
to an article’s talk page.
See also
[edit]- {{Criticism section}}, for use within articles that have a Controversy section that may compromise the article's overall neutrality
- {{Controversial-issues}}, for articles that contain controversial issues, instead of being controversial in of themselves.
Wikipedia project pages
[edit]- Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute
- Wikipedia:Consensus
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
- Wikipedia:Disputed statement
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Template index
- Wikipedia:Template namespace
Templates
[edit]Disputed factual accuracy
[edit]- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} For disputing entire article
- {{Dispute about|what}} For disputing part of an article
- {{Disputed section}} For disputing a section in an article
- {{Disputed tag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {{Under discussion}} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}}, and {{Disputed inline}} Statement
- {{Under discussion inline}} Statements on project pages
Both accuracy and POV
[edit]- Boxes:
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Disputed neutrality (POV)
[edit]- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article, {{POV section}} Section, {{POV lead}} Lead section
- {{POV map}} Map
- Inline:
- {{Unbalanced opinion}} Statement
- {{POV statement}} Statement