Jump to content

Tapela and Another v Attorney General and Others

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tapela and Another v Attorney General and Others is a legal case in Botswana concerning the right of two HIV-positive non-citizen prisoners to access antiretroviral (ARV) medication at state expense. On 22 August 2014, the High Court of Botswana in Gaborone ordered the government of Botswana to provide ARV medication to the prisoners.

Background

[edit]

The case was brought by two Zimbabwean citizens who were imprisoned in Gaborone Central Prison and the Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA).[1] The two prisoners were both diagnosed as HIV-positive in prison. They were denied ARV treatment despite that their physical conditions met the treatment criteria under the government's Treatment Guidelines. The government denied them ARV treatment on the basis that they were not citizens. HIV-positive prisoners who were citizens were given access to ARV treatment at state expense in terms of the government's policy at the time.[2]

Litigation

[edit]

The applicants brought a legal challenge against the government's refusal to provide the inmates with ARV treatment in the High Court in Gaborone. They argued that their denial of access to treatment, and the policy underlying the government's refusal to provide treatment, were unlawful and unconstitutional.[3]

Default judgment

[edit]

The state respondents initially failed to defend the application. Default judgment was therefore issued in the applicants' favour in March 2014.[4] The default judgment was rescinded with the parties’ consent on 19 March 2014.

High Court judgment

[edit]

The merits of the case were argued in the Gaborone High Court on 10 June 2014.[5] On 22 August 2014, Judge Bengame Sechele ruled in the applicants' favour.[6] The Court held that the policy denying foreign prisoners ARV treatment was unlawful in terms of the common law, statutory law and the Constitution of Botswana. The Court held that denying the prisoners ARV treatment unjustifiably limited their rights to life, equality, and freedom from inhuman and degrading treatment. The Court ordered the Botswana government to enroll all foreign prisoners who meet the treatment criteria on ARV treatment.[7]

The government respondents initially indicated an intention to comply with the Court's order but have since appealed the High Court decision to the Botswana Court of Appeal.[8]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Wongai Zhangazha (2014-06-20). "HIV+ Zim prisoners take Botswana to court". Zimbabwe Independent. Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  2. ^ Victor Baatweng (2014-08-10). "Botswana in legal battle with foreign inmates". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  3. ^ Thamani Shabani (2014-06-12). "Court reserves judgement in ARV case". Botswana Daily News. Archived from the original on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  4. ^ Mthokozisi Dube (2014-08-23). "Botswana inmates to get ARVs". The Chronicle. Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  5. ^ SABC News (2014-06-10). "Botswana court to hear arguments in ARV treatment case". Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  6. ^ Al Jazeera (2014-08-23). "Botswana to pay for all inmates' HIV drugs". Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  7. ^ Godfrey Ganetsang (2014-08-25). "High Court orders Botswana to provide foreign inmates with ARVs". Sunday Standard. Retrieved 2014-12-04.
  8. ^ Mpho Tebele (2014-10-20). "Bots appeals against giving foreign inmates ARVs". The Southern Times. Retrieved 2014-12-05.
[edit]