Talk:Zune 80, 120

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Why is there a completely useless article for this? I am going to change it back to a revert. If anyone has any objections discuss it first, until then all the information you put in here is covered nicely by the article Zune. -Leif902 00:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I see why you did this now. I didn't realize this was already a community endorsed move. I have undone my revision. However, this article still lacks enough content to be worthwhile and probably should have been created after content was available, not now. -Leif902 00:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this page needs moar information like on development and marketshare and stuff, you know? so like somebody should probably add it

Starting Point

I'm too lame to design wiki pages, but the specs are available at http://www.zune.net/en-US/products/zune80gb/specs.htm 121.220.212.98 (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I typed this all out yesterday, in a less advertising form, but it was edited back. If it's needed, check the history.Nnnudibranch (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scarcity of Information

As a point of conversation, what type of information is recommended (history, design, even price...) Rangikusboy (talk) 02:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ZuneLogo Horizontal Large.jpg

Image:ZuneLogo Horizontal Large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo?

Could someone with one of these get a fair use photo? Tophtucker (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I totally meant to post that on Zune 4, 8 talk, not here. Ummm... but am I supposed to made edits to talk pages? Haha. Oh well. Tophtucker (talk) 01:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give a day or two before I delete the "Durability" section

It is either original research that cannot be verified or sloppy editing. If anyone has a plan to fix it, respond. Otherwise, it needs to go.--Asderoff (talk) 02:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Combining Zune 80 & 120

I don't know who decided to revert my move of renaming the article to "Zune 80, 120" in the same fashion as the "Zune 4, 8" article (now "Zune 4, 8, 16"), but if you want "proof" (as they call it) of the Zune 120 existing, here are many confirmations from Microsoft about the 120 player, starting with the press release of Monday:

If nobody objects by Friday, I'll rename the article once again to "Zune 80, 120" as CLEARLY they are the same hardware with just a storage bump. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cumbiagermen (talk • contribs) 17:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Product not yet released. Until it is in general availability, then you can rename. --PenaltyKillah^{^Jw21} 19:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm changing it, product released today.--Cumbiagermen (talk) 02:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zune 16

Please see discussion at Talk:Zune#Zune 16. -down load | sign! 02:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zune 80 and 120 still in production

Why the were if zune orginals still selling it

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zune 80, 120. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]