Talk:Zud Schammel

Zud Schammel has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 18, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

College football Mid‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Bay Packers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Zud Schammel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Jug Bennett, Merle Zuver, Lyle Sturgeon, Wuert Engelmann, Zud Schammel, Hal Hinte and Frank Butler all played for Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame head coach Curly Lambeau during the 1930s and 1940s?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jug Bennett.

Wikipedia

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that Jug Bennett, Merle Zuver, Lyle Sturgeon, Wuert Engelmann, Zud Schammel, Hal Hinte and Frank Butler all played for Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame head coach Curly Lambeau during the 1930s and 1940s?

Sources:

Reviewed: (1) Gisele Thompson; (2) Unus testis, nullus testis; (3) List of songs recorded by Angeline Quinto; (4) Ade Surapriatna; (5) C. O. Brocato; (6) Bradley Winslow; (7) Get Him Back!

5x expanded by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jug Bennett; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I'll review these. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- BeanieFan11 QPQ is done. I'm never doing a 7-part nom ever again haha. Thanks for taking this on. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewing...
For Bennett:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Bennett meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Zuver:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Zuver meets all the criteria (albeit barely, as the length is only a couple of letters over the limit - expansion would be nice but is not required). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Sturgeon:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Sturgeon meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Englemann:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Englemann meets all the criteria (just passes the length requirement - though further expansion is not required, I see a few additional details you might want to add from the German Wikipedia of all places, including that he narrowly missed qualifying for the 1928 Olympics and was inducted into the South Dakota Hall of Fame). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Schammel:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Schammel meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Hinte:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hinte meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Butler:

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Butler meets all the criteria (albeit barely, being seven characters over the limit). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After further review, this DYK nomination is good! Each article appears to meet all the criteria, and thus this nomination appears ready to go! Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks BeanieFan11, I expanded Engelmann with your new info/sources. Thanks! Zuver was the toughest one. Not much more to expand on. Appreciate the thorough review! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zud Schammel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 01:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll grab another of these to review, though with the caveat that I'm going to wait until the newspapers approval kicks in so I can do my check for breadth. Wizardman 01:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did give the article a read-through and did a source check, and found no issues with anything there. I did just get the e-mail for getting things set up on Newspapers so I should be able to double-check both this and the other article on that front tomorrow. Wizardman 02:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I have approval, I did a skim of sources and I found a few that could expand the article a bit. I'll research further and post my findings on that front in a couple days. Wizardman 00:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One thing I did find is that apparently he was set to be traded to the NFL's Brooklyn Dodgers in October 1937, then two weeks later they realized he had a no-trade clause (I genuinely did not know they had things like that in contracts back then) and gave him back to Green Bay. I'd say that's worth adding into the article and it would explain only playing in 8 of the 11 games. Wizardman 23:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wizardman, I have add a few sentences on it. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I'll do a second run-through in a day or two to make sure there's nothing I missed but I think we're good here. Wizardman 23:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see no further issues on a re-read and re-newspapers check so I'm happy to pass this as a GA. Wizardman 23:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]