Talk:Zubik v. Burwell

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

The recent addition of a section "Legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" has a lot of good content, but it is long and I am inclined to make it a separate article List of legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that would be linked from this articles and others related to the ACA as well. It would fit well in Category:United States case law lists. Any objection?--agr (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ArnoldReinhold: I noticed that the list was recently removed by Xenophrenic. I think the list of challenges went into too much detail for this article, but I also like the idea of moving this material to its own article. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would that list article be redundant to Legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which already has much of the same information in a more encyclopedic format? I've removed the addition, by the way, as it was made by a banned disruptive editor who has been spamming it into many different locations for a couple years. Xenophrenic (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of the article for Legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act until you linked it above, but I agree that it is the best location to integrate information about ACA challenges. In any event, I think the list of challenges that was removed from this article went into excessive detail and will likely need to be trimmed down before it is added anywhere. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that article either. I don't think the material in question constitutes spam. I added it, with some edits to its introduction to Constitutional challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Further discussion should probably be at Talk:Constitutional challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act--agr (talk) 13:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eighth Circuit

Does anyone know the status of the Eighth Circuit cases that the government lost: Sharpe Holdings v. HHS and Dordt College v. Burwell ? Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]