This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
I'm not entirely convinced that this page should be deleted as a copyvio - the lead has existed largely unchanged since 2008, and I don't see any indication that abbreviation.com had it first (in fact, the way it's laid out makes me think reverse copy). Ping to Moneytrees for a 2O. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Please note that I removed a great deal of copyrighted content from this article today. See [1][2][3] and [4]. I don't know when this material was introduced into the article, but it should be suppressed as a copyright violation. This content should be revdel'd per Wikipedia:Copyright violations. I believe attribution is important as well, as it's required for licensing. I had intended on attributing two things on the draft if I had moved it to replace the original article; the sentence about the acquisition of Cloudneeti, and the infobox. Both were copied from the prior article; the sentence word for word and the infobox slightly modified. Everything else was newly created content. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure I found all of the historical cv content that Hammersoft removed, but if you feel up to it you're welcome to check some of the older stuff; I found a some matches but since they were from recent papers/sites/etc I mostly skipped until I found the content that was actually later removed. Primefac (talk) 01:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)And yes, I do know about the check boxes, it was useful even back in 2017! ;-)[reply]
I came here from their website expecting to find more objective information. This article reads exactly like a landing page and is very light on details. It is heavy on buzzwords for Wikipedia; "a leader on zero trust" is obscure (following the "zero trust" link will introduce it as "an approach to the design of IT systems", no reference for "leader"), "cloud-native platform" (what's that? no link).
Under the fold, the number of patents, the significance of their various ISO certifications, the list of accolades from the press don't make this better. These are not even presented in chronological order, albeit in the "history" section.
Does this marketing page really need to exist on Wikipedia?
This page is just a stub. Looks to me like something that should be marked for deletion. A few Low-importance flags underline that it should just be deleted. Cameron Bales (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]