Talk:Zovaber, Gegharkunik

Armenia Low‑importance

	Zovaber, Gegharkunik is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zovaber, Gegharkunik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130602113030/http://world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gcis&lng=en&des=wg&geo=-17&srt=npan&col=abcdefghinoq&msz=1500&pt=c&va=x to http://world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gcis&lng=en&des=wg&geo=-17&srt=npan&col=abcdefghinoq&msz=1500&pt=c&va=x

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marz

@AntonSamuel Could you please explain why you've moved this article back to its "Gegharkunik" designation seeing as the village is shown on OpenStreetMap and Google Maps to be inside the Hrazdan Municipality of the Kotayk Province? It's clear from the maps that the village must have moved provinces after the 2011 census. – Olympian ^loquere 05:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Olympian: Hey! The maps may very well be off, I've seen that with regard to names and borders in several other cases - if there are credible sources stating that Zovaber is now administered as part of the Kotayk province - I don't have a problem with a move. Though if you check recent news mentioning the village in Armenian [1], it seems that the reports all mention the village as part of the province of Gegharkunik. AntonSamuel (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, on the official website of the Hrazdan Municipality, when you click this option and scroll down to find Zovaber, it's shown within the Kotayk section. Please let me know if this is acceptable. – Olympian ^loquere 05:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird - but that's an archived page you've linked, currently that website [2] is not working or has been discontinued. If you check the current Kotayk Province webpage, Zovaber isn't included among the communities [3] or as a non-community settlement within Hrazdan community [4]. Zovaber does show up as part of the Sevan community on the webpage of the Gegharkunik province [5]. AntonSamuel (talk) 06:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for sharing those sources, the status-quo is acceptable. – Olympian ^loquere 07:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]