Talk:Prince Bernhard's titi monkey

Prince Bernhard's titi monkey has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 1, 2022. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Prince Bernhard's titi monkey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Prince Bernhard's titi monkey is known locally as zog-zog?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Bernhard's titi monkey.

Wikipedia

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Primates Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Etrius ( Us) 13:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Prince Bernhard's titi monkey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 02:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lets get this reviewed.

Copy-vios

It is estimated that it will lose 44.5% of its current range over the next 24 years (three generations). A bit too close to the original, bordering on close-paraphrasing.
I mixed it up a little. It should be better now.

Images

Rights are in order
I found [1] on the commons if you want to add it.
Done

Sources

I managed to find [2], its an excerpt from the Associated Press. It has a bit of interesting info but nothing groundbreaking. I tried to find the original, no such luck.
Added a little.
This source describes the discovery in closer detail [3].
Not much new, but again, I added a little.
Noticing a lot of sources citing the same papers, I get what you mean by this is the majority of info.

Prose

would recommend collapsing Etymology and Taxonomy.
Done
I see in FN 1 that the species was discovered in 1998. This article says 2002. Thoughts?
Where does it say that? I looked through that and a few other sources and the only date I have seen is 2002.

The specimen apparently died from natural causes and was collected by M. G. M. van Roosmalen in November 1998. Correction, it was FN 2.

Well, 2002 was when it was first described, but I added a mention of this as well.

There are a few details that could be added from FN 1 but I won't quibble over relatively minor bits of info. The differences between it and closely related species would be nice to add.

I included some of these details.

Thermoregulation can be expanded and should be reworded for a more encyclopedic tone. Source goes very in depth.
I improved the tone and added some detail, although I didn't want to risk WP:INDISCRIMINATE by going too in-depth. It should be sufficient the way it currently is.

That's really all I could find. The page is very well written overall and a few expansions/clarifications are needed. I made some minor clarifications, feel free to double check my edits. On Hold. Etrius ( Us) 02:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How does it look now? An anonymous username, not my real name 04:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work!! I gave the page a second pass and there are no major issues relevant to GA criteria. Page passes. Congrats!!! Etrius ( Us) 13:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Prince Bernhard's titi monkey is known locally as zog-zog? Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20221027205347/http://marcvanroosmalen.info/images/Taxonomic_Review_of_Titi_Monkeys.pdf
- ALT1: ... that Prince Bernhard's titi monkey's English common name is named after Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld? Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20221027205347/http://marcvanroosmalen.info/images/Taxonomic_Review_of_Titi_Monkeys.pdf
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Andrea Bonetti

Improved to Good Article status by An anonymous username, not my real name (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 13:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This was just improved to GA, it's long enough. Hook is short, interesting and verified. You could alternatively put "known as zog-zog or zogue-zogue" as this is what the source says. I personally prefer the "zog-zog" hook over ALT1. Nice work on the article! Arcahaeoindris (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Arcahaeoindris: did you mean to approve the article? Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is approved! Apologies I missed the bit at the top - now done. Also should say QPQ is also checked and fine as this seems to be first nomination. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ticking for posterity :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 08:45, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]