Talk:Zico

Requested move 1 July 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zico → Zico (disambiguation) – undiscussed move Matthew hk (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- And also Zico (footballer) → Zico – undiscussed move Matthew hk (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew hk: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This depends on whether the footballer is the dominant meaning of the name Zico, which has 12 other meanings listed in page Zico. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Matthew hk (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For context, the footballer occupied the Zico article name for ages. Some random guy move it without discussion. For page view certainly the Brazilian footballer is the primary topic. Also only the Brazilian footballer tag as level-5 vital article. Matthew hk (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I would have speedily closed this and moved it back for procedural reasons, except that I do in fact agree with the move. If you compare the two main entries, they are neck and neck. There is perhaps a subjective argument that the footballer is more "important", which I don't doubt, but I hesitate to weight pageviews for living people differently based on preference. I would have set up a WP:DABTEST, but currently too many links for the footballer point at Zico so the results would be biased. (The goal of such a test would be to see where people who land at the disambiguation page prefer to go.) Anyways, the proper way forward would be to move it back and start an RM there, but to reduce the amount of red tape, we can just hold this RM here as is and default to moving it back if no consensus is achieved. Based on my rationale given, I oppose. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King of Hearts. The undiscussed page move was a bad idea, even if the move was good. The footballer is not the PRIMARYTOPIC. Giant Snowman 17:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How, Zico the Brazilian footballer is not the PRIMARYTOPIC? The other footballer entries either only use Zico as part of their name (as given name) and probably attribute to Zico the legend footballer . While for English world Zico (rapper) is nowhere the PRIMARYTOPIC. Zico Football Center is named after the Brazilian footballer. Or you mean ZICO (beverage) is a candidate to challenge the status of PRIMARYTOPIC? Matthew hk (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zico (rapper) is not the primary topic, but is enough to knock the footballer off the pedestal. The pageview statistics between the two are very close, and have been for years so this isn't some WP:RECENTISM thing. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It is not clear from long-term page views that the footballer is more popular than the rapper. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No clear primary topic. There seem to be some editors who think all page moves should be discussed first. This is certainly not the case. This was not a controversial move. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.