Talk:Zhiar Ali/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 17:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Article looks good to not quickfail, sooo I'm gonna get right into reviewing!

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is clear and concise, easily understandable to a broad audience. SPaG appears to be broadly correct from what I could spot of it
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The article meets MoS guidance for the lead section and layout, and all other MoS components
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Article provides a references list which is formatted consistently within the article
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	The article uses reliable citations that back up claims. Self Citation check: 1,3,5,7,14,15,16,36,64,65
	2c. it contains no original research.	All claims are cited inline
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Other than the quote (which doesn't count), I don't see any copyvios present within the article
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Article addresses the main aspects of the person in an appropriate detail.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Article does not go into unnecessary detail and is focused on the topic.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Article obeys NPOV, did not see any violations of it
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article does not change dramatically on a day to day basis.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are tagged with copyright status
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All images are captioned appropriately for their content and are relevent to the person
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.