Talk:Zfone

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Plagiarism/Attribution?

The entry appears to be taken verbatim out of VON Magazine's interview with Phil Zimmerman in the January 2007 issue, page 19: http://www.vonmag-digital.com/vonmag/200701/?pg=19

Daniel Luechtefeld 08:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct and I reverted the page to a clean version. BJ^Talk 09:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? No, I supplied some text to this Wiki article from my own writings. I also later supplied similar text to the VON magazine article. This is not plagarism from VON magazine. Don't be so quick to conclude that it is. This page should be restored. prz

Can you prove you own the copyright to the text? BJ^Talk 09:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, helps to read user pages before commenting... BJ^Talk 09:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GPL misunderstanding

"Zfone's libZRTP SDK libraries are released under a GPL or a commercial license." Software licensed under the GPL can be commercialized. It seems that the author meant a non-free or proprietary license. This needs to be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.215.73 (talk) 09:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

It is important because it is the first software that allows secure VoIP communication independent of the used software. helohe (talk) 10:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zfone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060409190954/http://wired.com:80/news/technology/0,70524-0.html? to http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70524-0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]