Talk:Zezi Ifore

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Big Brother High‑importance

	Television portal The Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Zezi Ifore has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.Big BrotherWikipedia:WikiProject Big BrotherTemplate:WikiProject Big BrotherBig Brother articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"She is also rather annoying"

I agree with the sentiment but it is opinion, not fact. Hence I have removed the offending paragraph. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 09:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very annoying and not even decent wank fodder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.156.98 (talk) 15:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"How the hell does she get all this work?"

Serious question actually - she is of no immediately apparent talent but has a considerable number of jobs in a variety of spheres under her belt - so how did she get this work? What got her foot in the door? She studied at Oxford yet toured as a backup dancer? How were no actual dancers available at the time? I'm basically wondering if she's someone important's daughter... anyone know a potted biography? --Fleeelf (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm seeing reports that she didn't compelte her degree, leaving after only a year. Can anyone confirm? 131.111.200.200 (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Zizi [sic] adopts a zany and quirky style"

This is also a matter of opinion. The words "viewing figures can suggest" are weasel words. Either they suggest or they don't. If Ifore's zany presentation style has indeed resulted in a decline in viewing figures for the show then this should be re-worded and a citation provided. Otherwise the sentence will be deleted. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

I find it amusing that someone bothered to write this. She is a terrible presenter and I hope that whoever it was at E4 that thought she was up to the job, is now standing on the rooftop edge ready to jump! Possibly also the person at Universal who maybe suggested that she should take the e4Music job. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.234.60 (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's an encyclopedia. She may be terrible, but she is notable, at least until her spell as BBLB presenter ends. A Sheep (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 10:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

It'd be good if people could remember that Wikipedia isn't a forum. I may agree with your opinions, but this isn't the place to air them. Quit vandalising the page. Nicpowel (talk) 12:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

I've reverted quite a lot of changes, as there was a long section which was very questionably worded, and was irrelevant anyway seeing as there's a "Complaints" section. 17:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Where has the "Criticism" section gone?

She was widely criticised during the last series of Big Brother, but that section has been removed? Why?

This section has been removed because it's not warranted, these sources are all opinion blogs which fail WP:RS, the information is from tabloid blogs, and there's no need to give WP:UNDUE weight to these opinions by having a section on it which affects the WP:NPOV of the article. A line has been left in on her take on it. Roomiebroom (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IPA

I'm basing the pronunciation on someone mishearing her name as "daisy eyeful". But we should be able to do better. kwami (talk) 00:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]