Talk:Zeta Herculis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Could someone fix the caption on this Eta Herculis star chart? In the article Hercules (constellation) that caption states the connection of the stars is 'An alternative way to connect the stars of the constellation Hercules, suggested by H.A. Rey. Here, Hercules is shown with his head at the top'. Shouldn't the page on Eta Herculis reflect that it is an alternative drawing? Thanks. 99.118.199.88 (talk) 21:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Cited paper has error?
[edit]The separation in [7] is stated as "150 A.U." with a period of "34.45 years"! Given that the planet Pluto has an orbit of 30 to 49 AU (wiki) with a period of 247.68 years (wiki) and both Kaler and solstation indicate a average separation of 15 A.U. I think the original paper is in error. Could a real Astronomer please check. Have amended page to reflect the other sites.Brobof (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)