Talk:Zero Sum (The X-Files)
Appearance
Zero Sum (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Zero Sum (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 4) series, a good topic. It is also part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 2 series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Zero Sum (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Intro: ""Zero Sum" featured the final appearance in the series by Morris Panych; and saw the return of the virus-carrying bees which featured in the season-opener "Herrenvolk" and would later return in the 1998 feature film." I would break into two sentences and writing like this: "'Zero Sum' featured the final appearance in the series by Morris Panych. In addition, the episode saw the return of the virus-carrying bees which featured in the season-opener "Herrenvolk" and would later return in the 1998 feature film."
- Plot: "The Smoking Man refuses to provide any details on what he has covering up." I think the 'has' should either be 'was' or 'is'
- Production: "The producers, knowing that they would have to write an episode without Dana Scully, decided it was not fair to have David Duchovny carry the same workload as in a normal episode considering her absence, so they decided to write an episode where his involvement would also be light." Sort of lengthy and uses the word 'decide' twice
- Production: "This resulted in the decision to write, for the second year in a row, an episode focused on Assistant Director Walter Skinner (Mitch Pileggi)." Is it necessary to mention Pileggi again?
- Also, Maybe it's just me, but I think the episode got mixed to positive reviews, rather than just mixed, based on two being largely positive and one being less than stellar, but I don't know. Not a huge deal
- I added the Spotnitz quote as rationale for the screenshot, and now it looks good.
Those are the only things I can spot. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 19:07, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Think I've seen to everything you've mentioned; let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks for seeing to this one so quickly! GRAPPLE X 22:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Excellent, everything looks good! I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 22:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Think I've seen to everything you've mentioned; let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks for seeing to this one so quickly! GRAPPLE X 22:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics The X-Files (season 4) good content
- Wikipedia featured topics Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 2 good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Unknown-importance television articles
- GA-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- GA-Class The X-Files articles
- Mid-importance The X-Files articles
- The X-Files task force articles
- Automatically assessed television articles
- WikiProject Television articles