Talk:Zero-width space

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Character in the article

I came here specifically to copy/paste the ZWSP, and I can't be the only one. It should be in the article for people to copy: ()

Zero-width space in comparison to Zero-width non-joiner

So I was wondering, which one has more widespread support in browsers, the zero width space, the word break (<wbk>), or the zero-width non-joiner (&zwnj;)? --Lemi4 (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd add to that I think the article should discuss the subtle typographic differences between the weaker Zero-width non-joiner and the Zero-width space. For instance, does the Zero-Width Non Joiner allow line breaks? Does the Zero-Width Space change the beginnings and endings of adjacent words?

TimeHorse (talk) 11:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

“The non-standard `wbr` element”

`` is now actually defined in HTML5. -- [Mathias](http://mathiasbynens.be/) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.182.211.21 (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which Languages

Which scripts use this? Thai? Any others? Bostoner (talk) 18:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CJK =) 91.79.6.77 (talk) 09:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]