Talk:Zeph Ellis
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Associated acts
[edit]Template:Infobox_musical_artist includes under associated acts - "The following uses of this field should be avoided: One-time collaboration for a single, or on a single song"
On that - shouldn't Cher Lloyd and Ghetts come out ?
I can't see that Kid Bookie is even mentioned in the article !
-- Beardo (talk) 13:02, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zeph Ellis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120713052500/http://itsdotrotten.com/news to http://itsdotrotten.com/news
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
COI
[edit]@Zeph Ellis: please discuss here before removing content. — Zawl 13:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- I have to agree with @Zeph Ellis:'s edits. All content should be cited as per WP:BLP, specifically WP:BLPSOURCE. I invite editors to read the content of that second link before continuing this discussion. Any uncited content is subject to removal. Also pinging @PlyrStar93: @Hayman30:, ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡o) talk to me! 14:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- While I agree that unsourced material may be removed, everyone can randomly register an account or even not register an account and claim to be the subject of article. Earlier today there has been an IP 82.47.107.178 (talk) who has been removing content from this article, just something to keep in mind. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 14:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
I have left some guidance on the user's talkpage about getting assistance with perceived errors in an article about themselves. If there are doubts about the identity of the person claiming to be the article subject, the safest course is to direct them to email OTRS (by emailing info-en-q
wikimedia.org). Please try to make every effort to act with kindness toward the subjects of biographical material when the subjects arrive to express concern, even though they may not be familiar with how wikipedia works. WJBscribe (talk) 15:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Sneakbo beef
[edit]Removed longer previous account of this situation, which gave no citations and, when checked, several of the statements could not be corroborated per any kind of respectable news source or commentary outlet. The entire situation was far more convoluted than can be corroborated by the cited source, which doesn't cover a great deal of the subsequent developments over social media including the release of video of Sneakbo's assault of Dot Rotten; evident from the video is the presence of several other men, which corroborates Dot Rotten's own statements on the subject regarding Sneakbo having encountered him with numerous others. A lot of the discussion of this altercation is on Reddit, Twitter and Instagram, however, which means citation of reliable sources is difficult.