Jump to content

Talk:Zeo, Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

COI Disclaimer: I am employed by Zeo, Inc formerly known as Axon Labs.

This note is to let the community know that Axon Labs recently changed their official name to Zeo, Inc. Here is an article in Forbes that can verify this: [1].

Thank you.

-Jeremy


JDalnes (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed change

[edit]

{{request edit}}

Per my previous note in the discussion, I'd like to ask the editors to consider revising the Axon Labs entry to reflect the new corporate name, Zeo, Inc. Thank you.

JDalnes COI Disclaimer: I am an employee of Zeo, Inc.

JDalnes (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to a new title, and updated it. I also uploaded a new logo. -- kenb215 talk 01:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Edit/Update to Zeo Wiki

[edit]

I'd like to request the editors to consider updating the Zeo, Inc. page to accurately reflect the new product/mission of the company. We're no longer just a smart wake product but have evolved into a personal sleep coach. Please reference this Wall Street Journal article http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124451280076496767.html as a validated 3rd party source. Thank you. JDalnes COI Disclaimer: I am an employee of Zeo, Inc. --JDalnes (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a sentence about the new device. Is this along the lines of what you were asking for? ThemFromSpace 20:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does it work?

[edit]

I'm a sleep technician and am curious how this thing is capable of monitoring sleep stages. The official website shows a simple headband, which I doubt is as accurate as exploring-reference EEG electrode derivations. Furthermore, how sophisticated is the scoring software? In my experience, software that scores itself is terribly inaccurate, which is why we still have scoring technicians. Seeing as we have an employee of Zeo talking up this discussion page, I wonder if any specifics of the device's engineering are publicly available to be put on Wikipedia. 173.71.95.164 (talk) 04:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A belated response, after the company closed: Zeo claimed that the device was 75% reliable in distinguishing between states; REM sleep and wakefulness I believe were particularly difficult to distinguish. An independent study (I don't have the reference, writing from memory) found about 66% reliability. More sophisticated equipment is somewhat more reliable, but electrodes only don't allow some states to be distinguished, input of other parameters is required. Users' comments, often on feedback reports on sites such as Amazon (US & UK) suggest that the device simply does not work for some people; it was suggested that if Zeo had provided a sensitivity adjustment the device would have worked for these people. Zeo's response to such reports accepted that the device was unsuitable for some users, who should return it for refund.

The device lists time spent in each of the various sleep states, and a single "ZQ" score which is a weighted average, with, for example, deep sleep affecting the ZQ more than light sleep. The detailed components are available as well as the lumped ZQ.
ZQ = 8.5×(1×TST + 0.5×REM + 1.5×Deep - 0.5×TIW - #wakenings/15)
  • ZQ = Zeo Sleep Score
  • TST = Total Sleep Time
  • REM = hours in REM
  • Deep = hours in deep
  • TIW = hours in Wake
  • #wakenings = number of times woken

The headband has three dry electrodes, and can (in fact, not stated by Zeo) be replaced by three disposable ECG electrodes with adhesive gel. One of Zeo's researchers produced a video explanation (I haven't yet watched it):

HTH Pol098 (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zeo has shut down

[edit]

See http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/22/sleep-tracking-startup-zeo-says-goodnight/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.143.214 (talk) 06:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zeo, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]