Talk:Zendikar

"Third set" minor infobox mistake

At the bottom of the infobox, it says "third set in the Zendikar block", this is incorrect for it is the first set. I tried editing this but I can't, someone please fix this.Snikch (talk) 14:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tricky, but I fixed it.--King Bedford I ^{Seek his grace} 16:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha cool, thanks. Now let's hope that soon there'll be more to write about Zendikar.Snikch (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Known Mechanics

The Sub type "Trap" and the returning mechanic "Kicker" have been confirmed by the planeschase decks and the "state of Design 2009" article. Anyone feel free to add these. Pallid Sky (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Edit: Lifebaka corrected me. Snikch (talk) 21:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, I don't think ally is a mechanic (which is what the most recent edit moved it to in the infobox). Putting the type Ally in a creature's Type Line doesn't do anything by itself. Rather, it's used to include the creature in effects that reference allies, of which there are several types, which is made clear, I believe, in Mark Rosewater's most recent article at the official site. I feel it belongs where I originally had it, in the key words, and would like someone to explain why they thought it didn't belong there. TheDarkAdonis (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, putting anything as a subtype doesn't do anything by itself, but only matters if things reference the subtype (Mutant, Ninja, and Turtle, for example). And neither card types nor card subtypes are not keywords, by the definition in the Comprehensive Rules. Cheers. lifebaka++ 02:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link of the Development Code

I just noticed about the link of the development code that it was referring to ... the Vulcan Salute ! Why ?? Japanfan67 (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Zendikar

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Zendikar's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "maro":

From Rise of the Eldrazi: Rosewater, Mark (August 24, 2009). "State of Design 2009". Wizards of the Coast. Retrieved November 6, 2009.
From Unhinged (Magic: The Gathering): The Rosewater Rumble, Round 5: Zendikar (#4) vs. Unhinged (#13).

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Magic categories to be merged back to block structure discussion

A nomination can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 16#Category:Magic: The Gathering blocks to merge Magic categories back to blocks from sets. Feel free to join in on the discussion. Leitmotiv (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zendikar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]