Talk:Zebras (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks interesting, but I already found some link rot. Will review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Link rot fixed. --Davejohnsan (talk) 21:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

   B. Complies with manual of style guidelines for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Provides references to all sources according to the guide for layout:

   B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Main aspects are addressed:

   B. Focused: (See summary style):

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Very nice little article. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)